
BRIEF INTRODUCTION
Music is a
temporal art form, and although sometimes notated, it only exists in
the form of vibrating air over a span of time. It is a universal
language and a basic human need, with every recorded civilization
having some form of musical expression. Across all barriers of
time and culture, music has the unique ability to speak to our minds
and souls. Understanding how music accomplishes this and how each
dialect of musical expression is put together is essential to better
appreciating and relating to that universal message and the artistic
need it fulfills.
The vast majority of musical analysis has focused on pitch and how that
element is structured within each work. However, outside of
historical European-based western art music, including contemporary
western concert works, electro-acoustic music, indigenous music of Asia
and Africa, and the emerging "Sound Art" field, much of the music does
not focus upon – or even contain – pitch content at all. Yet,
these sonic art forms also appeal to and speak to people on the same
level. As a social melting pot, America has also become an
artistic melting pot, and these many forms and dialects of musical
expression are found all around us. The field of music cognition
has made great strides in better understanding how sound effects our
brains and in providing a scientific foundation for how we understand
and appreciate aural events. However, its application stops there
and the synthesis of this information into how we sense, feel, and
perceive larger elements in music – structure, flow, cadence, repose,
forward motion, climax, and the like – has remained virtually
unexplored. This led me to the research that resulted in my
doctoral dissertation , which created a system of musical analysis of
temporal elements in music. Most existing rhythmic theories and
analytical systems apply only to common practice, notated, metered
music. For example, at the end of The
Stratification of Musical Rhythm Maury Yeston adds the
disclaimer that his theories are "... limited to a kind of tonal music
in which the middleground rhythmic levels exhibit some regularity of
motion." Other texts, like Jonathan Kramer's The Time of Music, thoroughly
cover the philosophical unfolding of time within a work and the effects
of tonality and pitch material on the perception of time in a
work. Like Yeston, however, Kramer remains almost exclusively
within the realm of metered, traditional Western music, providing only
a passing mention of non-metered works and completely excludes electro
acoustic music, musique concrète, and much of the music of other
cultures.
Based upon established research in the field of music cognition, this
method of analysis of temporal elements focuses not upon pitch, style,
technique, or medium, but rather the cognitive relationships between
aural events within a work that form the properties of foreground,
background, cadence, and the elusive properties of pacing and 'flow' in
a work. Founded upon Jay Dowling's fundamental principles of the
mind's reaction to the effects of repetition and alignment to a common
pulse of individual sonic events (Dowling, 1986), a Temporal Element
analysis classifies longer, continuing events into five general
categories: sustained, repeating/aligned, non-repeating/aligned,
repeating/non-aligned, and non-repeating/non-aligned. Hybrid
elements comprised of traits of two or more categories and
transformational processes may be formed and identified, then discussed
in terms of their relative level of stability/instability. Once defined
and recognized, first-level musical analysis can be accomplished by
labeling and summarizing the use of these temporal elements in a work
through aural and visual measurements (by ear, through a notated score,
or via simple, free sound editing software). Analytical results may
then be discussed and presented in a simple, graphic format rather than
long sets of complex tables and numeric formulas. Often, elegant
structural traits are found in many works that elude current analytical
techniques.