UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL LAW, 1985
U.N. Doc. A/40/17, Annex I
[To jump directly to the full text of the Model Law, click here . To jump directly to a particular
chapter or
article in the Model Law, scroll down in the following table of
contents and click the relevant chapter or article.]
Table of Contents
Chapter I. General provisions
-
Article 1. Scope of application
Article 2. Definitions and rules of
interpretation
Article 3. Receipt of written communications
Article 4. Waiver of right to object
Article 5. Extent of court intervention
Article 6. Court or other authority for certain
functions of arbitration assistance and supervision
Chapter II. Arbitration agreement
-
Article 7. Definition and form of arbitration agreement
Article 8. Arbitration and substantive claim before court
Article 9. Arbitration agreement and interim measures by court
Chapter III. Composition of arbitral
tribunal
-
Article 10. Number of arbitrators
Article 11. Appointment of arbitrators
Article 12. Grounds for challenge
Article 13. Challenge procedure
Article 14. Failure or impossibility to act
Article 15. Appointment of substitute arbitrator
Chapter IV. Jurisdiction of arbitral
tribunal
-
Article 16. Competence of arbitral tribunal to rule on its
jurisdiction
Article 17. Power of arbitral tribunal to order interim
measures
Chapter V. Conduct of arbitral
procedings
-
Article 18. Equal treatment of parties
Article 19. Determination of rules of procedure
Article 20. Place of arbitration
Article 21. Commencement of arbitral proceedings
Article 22. Language
Article 23. Statements of claim and defence
Article 24. Hearings and written proceedings
Article 25. Default of a party
Article 26. Expert appointed by arbitral tribunal
Article 27. Court assistance in taking evidence
Chapter VI. Making of award and
termination of
proceedings
-
Article 28. Rules applicable to substance of dispute
Article 29. Decision making by panel of arbitrators
Article 30. Settlement
Article 31. Form and contents of award
Article 32. Termination of proceedings
Article 33. Correction and interpretation of award; additional
award
Chapter VII. Recourse against award
-
Article 34. Application for setting aside as exclusive recourse
against arbitral award
Chapter VIII. Recognition and
enforcement of awards
-
Article 35. Recognition and enforcement
Article 36. Grounds for refusing recognition or enforcement
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
TEXT OF MODEL LAW
CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1. Scope of application*
-
* Article headings are for reference purposes only and are not
to be used for purposes of interpretation.
-
(1) This Law applies to international commercial** arbitration,
subject to any agreement in force between this State and any
other State or States.
-
** The term
"commercial"
should be given a wide interpretation so as to cover matters
arising from all relationships of a commercial nature, whether
contractual or not. Relationships of a commercial nature
include, but are not limited to, the following transactions: any
trade transaction for the supply or exchange of goods or
services; distribution agreement; commercial representation or
agency; factoring; leasing; construction of works;
consulting; engineering; licensing; investment; financing;
banking; insurance; exploitation agreement or concession;
joint venture and other forms of industrial or business
co-operation; carriage of goods or passengers by air, sea, rail
or road.
-
(2) The provisions of this Law, except articles 8, 9, 35 and 36,
apply only if the place of arbitration is in the territory of
this State.
(3) An arbitration is international if:
-
(a) the parties to an arbitration agreement have, at the time of
the conclusion of that agreement, their places of business in
different States; or
(b) one of the following places is situated outside the State in
which the parties have their places of business:
-
(i) the place of arbitration if determined in, or pursuant to,
the arbitration agreement;
(ii) any place where a substantial part of the obligations of
the commercial relationship is to be performed or the place with
which the subject-matter of the dispute is most closely
connected; or
(c) the parties have expressly agreed that the subject-matter of
the arbitration agreement relates to more than one country.
(4) For the purposes of paragraph (3) of this article:
-
(a) if a party has more than one place of business, the place of
business is that which has the closest relationship to the
arbitration agreement;
(b) if a party does not have a place of business, reference is
to be made to his habitual residence.
(5) This Law shall not affect any other law of this State by
virtue of which certain disputes may not be submitted to
arbitration or may be submitted to arbitration only according to
provisions other than those of this Law.
Article 2. Definitions and rules of
interpretation
-
For the purposes of this Law:
-
(a)
"arbitration" means any
arbitration whether or not administered by a permanent arbitral
institution;
(b) "arbitral tribunal"
means a sole arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators;
(c) "court" means a body or
organ of the judicial system of a State;
(d) where a provision of this Law, except article 28, leaves the
parties free to determine a certain issue, such freedom includes
the right of the parties to authorize a third party, including an
institution, to make that determination;
(e) where a provision of this Law refers to the fact that the
parties have agreed or that they may agree or in any other way
refers to an agreement of the parties, such agreement includes
any arbitration rules referred to in that agreement;
(f) where a provision of this Law, other than in articles 25(a)
and 32(2)(a), refers to a claim, it also applies to a
counter-claim, and where it refers to a defence, it also applies
to a defence to such counter-claim.
Article 3. Receipt of written communications
-
(1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties:
(a) any written communication is deemed to have been received if
it is delivered to the addressee personally or if it is delivered
at his place of business, habitual residence or mailing address;
if none of these can be found after making a reasonable inquiry,
a written communication is deemed to have been received if it is
sent to the addressee's last-known place of business, habitual
residence or mailing address by registered letter or any other
means which provides a record of the attempt to deliver it;
(b) the communication is deemed to have been received on the day
it is so delivered.
(2) The provisions of this article do not apply to
communications in court proceedings.
Article 4. Waiver of right to object
A party who knows that any provision of this Law from which the
parties may derogate or any requirement under the arbitration
agreement has not been complied with and yet proceeds with the
arbitration without stating his objection to such non-compliance
without undue delay or, if a time-limit is provided therefor,
within such period of time, shall be deemed to have waived his
right to object.
Article 5. Extent of court intervention
In matters governed by this Law, no court shall intervene except
where so provided in this Law.
Article 6. Court or other authority for
certain functions of arbitration assistance and supervision
The functions referred to in articles 11(3), 11(4), 13(3), 14,
16(3) and 34(2) shall be performed by ... [Each State enacting
this model law specifies the court, courts or, where referred to
therein, other authority competent to perform these functions.]
CHAPTER II. ARBITRATION AGREEMENT
Article 7. Definition and form of arbitration agreement
(1) "Arbitration agreement"
is an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or
certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between
them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether
contractual or not. An arbitration agreement may be in the form
of an arbitration clause in a contract or in the form of a
separate agreement.
(2) The arbitration agreement shall be in writing. An agreement
is in writing if it is contained in a document signed by the
parties or in an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other
means of telecommunication which provide a record of the
agreement, or in an exchange of statements of claim and defence
in which the existence of an agreement is alleged by one party
and not denied by another. The reference in a contract to a
document containing an arbitration clause constitutes an
arbitration agreement provided that the contract is in writing
and the reference is such as to make that clause part of the
contract.
Article 8. Arbitration agreement and substantive claim
before court
(1) A court before which an action is brought in a matter which
is the subject of an arbitration agreement shall, if a party so
requests not later than when submitting his first statement on
the substance of the dispute, refer the parties to arbitration
unless it finds that the agreement is null and void, inoperative
or incapable of being performed.
(2) Where an action referred to in paragraph (1) of this article
has been brought, arbitral proceedings may nevertheless be
commenced or continued, and an award may be made, while the issue
is pending before the court.
Article 9. Arbitration agreement and interim measures by
court
It is not incompatible with an arbitration agreement for a party
to request, before or during arbitral proceedings, from a court
an interim measure of protection and for a court to grant such
measure.
CHAPTER III. COMPOSITION OF ARBITRAL
TRIBUNAL
Article 10. Number of arbitrators
(1) The parties are free to determine the number of arbitrators.
(2) Failing such determination, the number of arbitrators shall
be three.
Article 11. Appointment of arbitrators
(1) No person shall be precluded by reason of his nationality
from acting as an arbitrator, unless otherwise agreed by the
parties.
(2) The parties are free to agree on a procedure of appointing
the arbitrator or arbitrators, subject to the provisions of
paragraphs (4) and (5) of this article.
(3) Failing such agreement,
(a) in an arbitration with three arbitrators, each party shall
appoint one arbitrator, and the two arbitrators thus appointed
shall appoint the third arbitrator; if a party fails to appoint
the arbitrator within thirty days of receipt of a request to do
so from the other party, or if the two arbitrators fail to agree
on the third arbitrator within thirty days of their appointment,
the appointment shall be made, upon request of a party, by the
court or other authority specified in article 6;
(b) in an arbitration with a sole arbitrator, if the parties are
unable to agree on the arbitrator, he shall be appointed, upon
request of a party, by the court or other authority specified in
article 6.
(4) Where, under an appointment procedure agreed upon by the
parties,
(a) a party fails to act as required under such procedure, or
(b) the parties, or two arbitrators, are unable to reach an
agreement expected of them under such procedure, or
(c) a third party, including an institution, fails to perform
any function entrusted to it under such procedure,
any party may request the court or other authority specified in
article 6 to take the necessary measure, unless the agreement on
the appointment procedure provides other means for securing the
appointment.
(5) A decision on a matter entrusted by paragraph (3) or (4) of
this article to the court or other authority specified in article
6 shall be subject to no appeal. The court or other authority,
in appointing an arbitrator, shall have due regard to any
qualifications required of the arbitrator by the agreement of the
parties and to such considerations as are likely to secure the
appointment of an independent and impartial arbitrator and, in
the case of a sole or third arbitrator, shall take into account
as well the advisability of appointing an arbitrator of a
nationality other than those of the parties.
Article 12. Grounds for challenge
(1) When a person is approached in connection with his possible
appointment as an arbitrator, he shall disclose any circumstances
likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his impartiality
or independence. An arbitrator, from the time of his appointment
and throughout the arbitral proceedings, shall without delay
disclose any such circumstances to the parties unless they have
already been informed of them by him.
(2) An arbitrator may be challenged only if circumstances exist
that give rise to justifiable doubts as to his impartiality or
independence, or if he does not possess qualifications agreed to
by the parties. A party may challenge an arbitrator appointed by
him, or in whose appointment he has participated, only for
reasons of which he becomes aware after the appointment has been
made.
Article 13. Challenge procedure
(1) The parties are free to agree on a procedure for challenging
an arbitrator, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this
article.
(2) Failing such agreement, a party who intends to challenge an
arbitrator shall, within fifteen days after becoming aware of the
constitution of the arbitral tribunal or after becoming aware of
any circumstance referred to in article 12(2), send a written
statement of the reasons for the challenge to the arbitral
tribunal. Unless the challenged arbitrator withdraws from his
office or the other party agrees to the challenge, the arbitral
tribunal shall decide on the challenge.
(3) If a challenge under any procedure agreed upon by the
parties or under the procedure of paragraph (2) of this article
is not successful, the challenging party may request, within
thirty days after having received notice of the decision
rejecting the challenge, the court or other authority specified
in article 6 to decide on the challenge, which decision shall be
subject to no appeal; while such a request is pending, the
arbitral tribunal, including the challenged arbitrator, may
continue the arbitral proceedings and make an award.
Article 14. Failure or impossibility to act
(1) If an arbitrator becomes de jure or de facto
unable to perform his functions or for other reasons fails
to act without undue delay, his mandate terminates if he
withdraws from his office or if the parties agree on the
termination. Otherwise, if a controversy remains concerning any
of these grounds, any party may request the court or other
authority specified in article 6 to decide on the termination of
the mandate, which decision shall be subject to no appeal.
(2) If, under this article or article 13(2), an arbitrator
withdraws from his office or a party agrees to the termination of
the mandate of an arbitrator, this does not imply acceptance of
the validity of any ground referred to in this article or article
12(2).
Article 15. Appointment of substitute arbitrator
Where the mandate of an arbitrator terminates under article 13
or 14 or because of his withdrawal from office for any other
reason or because of the revocation of his mandate by agreement
of the parties or in any other case of termination of his
mandate, a substitute arbitrator shall be appointed according to
the rules that were applicable to the appointment of the
arbitrator being replaced.
CHAPTER IV. JURISDICTION OF ARBITRAL
TRIBUNAL
Article 16. Competence of arbitral tribunal to rule on its
jurisdiction
(1) The arbitral tribunal may rule on its own jurisdiction,
including any objections with respect to the existence or
validity of the arbitration agreement. For that purpose, an
arbitration clause which forms part of a contract shall be
treated as an agreement independent of the other terms of the
contract. A decision by the arbitral tribunal that the contract
is null and void shall not entail ipso jure the
invalidity of the arbitration clause.
(2) A plea that the arbitral tribunal does not have jurisdiction
shall be raised not later than the submission of the statement of
defence. A party is not precluded from raising such a plea by
the fact that he has appointed, or participated in the
appointment of, an arbitrator. A plea that the arbitral tribunal
is exceeding the scope of its authority shall be raised as soon
as the matter alleged to be beyond the scope of its authority is
raised during the arbitral proceedings. The arbitral tribunal
may, in either case, admit a later plea if it considers the delay
justified.
(3) The arbitral tribunal may rule on a plea referred to in
paragraph (2) of this article either as a preliminary question or
in an award on the merits. If the arbitral tribunal rules as a
preliminary question that it has jurisdiction, any party may
request, within thirty days after having received notice of that
ruling, the court specified in article 6 to decide the matter,
which decision shall be subject to no appeal; while such a
request is pending, the arbitral tribunal may continue the
arbitral proceedings and make an award.
Article 17. Power of arbitral tribunal to order interim
measures
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal
may, at the request of a party, order any party to take such
interim measure of protection as the arbitral tribunal may
consider necessary in respect of the subject-matter of the
dispute. The arbitral tribunal may require any party to provide
appropriate security in connection with such measure.
CHAPTER V. CONDUCT OF ARBITRAL
PROCEEDINGS
Article 18. Equal treatment of parties
The parties shall be treated with equality and each party shall
be given a full opportunity of presenting his case.
Article 19. Determination of rules of procedure
(1) Subject to the provisions of this Law, the parties are free
to agree on the procedure to be followed by the arbitral tribunal
in conducting the proceedings.
(2) Failing such agreement, the arbitral tribunal may, subject
to the provisions of this Law, conduct the arbitration in such
manner as it considers appropriate. The power conferred upon the
arbitral tribunal includes the power to determine the
admissibility, relevance, materiality and weight of any evidence.
Article 20. Place of arbitration
(1) The parties are free to agree on the place of arbitration.
Failing such agreement, the place of arbitration shall be
determined by the arbitral tribunal having regard to the
circumstances of the case, including the convenience of the
parties.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1) of this
article, the arbitral tribunal may, unless otherwise agreed by
the parties, meet at any place it considers appropriate for
consultation among its members, for hearing witnesses, experts or
the parties, or for inspection of goods, other property or
documents.
Article 21. Commencement of arbitral proceedings
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral proceedings
in respect of a particular dispute commence on the date on which
a request for that dispute to be referred to arbitration is
received by the respondent.
Article 22. Language
(1) The parties are free to agree on the language or languages
to be used in the arbitral proceedings. Failing such agreement,
the arbitral tribunal shall determine the language or languages
to be used in the proceedings. This agreement or determination,
unless otherwise specified therein, shall apply to any written
statement by a party, any hearing and any award, decision or
other communication by the arbitral tribunal.
(2) The arbitral tribunal may order that any documentary
evidence shall be accompanied by a translation into the language
or languages agreed upon by the parties or determined by the
arbitral tribunal.
Article 23. Statements of claim and defence
(1) Within the period of time agreed by the parties or
determined by the arbitral tribunal, the claimant shall state the
facts supporting his claim, the points at issue and the relief or
remedy sought, and the respondent shall state his defence in
respect of these particulars, unless the parties have otherwise
agreed as to the required elements of such statements. The
parties may submit with their statements all documents they
consider to be relevant or may add a reference to the documents
or other evidence they will submit.
(2) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, either party may
amend or supplement his claim or defence during the course of the
arbitral proceedings, unless the arbitral tribunal considers it
inappropriate to allow such amendment having regard to the delay
in making it.
Article 24. Hearings and written proceedings
(1) Subject to any contrary agreement by the parties, the
arbitral tribunal shall decide whether to hold oral hearings for
the presentation of evidence or for oral argument, or whether the
proceedings shall be conducted on the basis of documents and
other materials. However, unless the parties have agreed that no
hearings shall be held, the arbitral tribunal shall hold such
hearings at an appropriate stage of the proceedings, if so
requested by a party.
(2) The parties shall be given sufficient advance notice of any
hearing and of any meeting of the arbitral tribunal for the
purposes of inspection of goods, other property or documents.
(3) All statements, documents or other information supplied to
the arbitral tribunal by one party shall be communicated to the
other party. Also any expert report or evidentiary document on
which the arbitral tribunal may rely in making its decision shall
be communicated to the parties.
Article 25. Default of a party
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, if, without showing
sufficient cause,
(a) the claimant fails to communicate his statement of claim in
accordance with article 23(1), the arbitral tribunal shall
terminate the proceedings;
(b) the respondent fails to communicate his statement of defence
in accordance with article 23(1), the arbitral tribunal shall
continue the proceedings without treating such failure in itself
as an admission of the claimant's allegations;
(c) any party fails to appear at a hearing or to produce
documentary evidence, the arbitral tribunal may continue the
proceedings and make the award on the evidence before it.
Article 26. Expert appointed by arbitral tribunal
(1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral
tribunal
(a) may appoint one or more experts to report to it on specific
issues to be determined by the arbitral tribunal;
(b) may require a party to give the expert any relevant
information or to produce, or to provide access to, any relevant
documents, goods or other property for his inspection.
(2) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, if a party so
requests or if the arbitral tribunal considers it necessary, the
expert shall, after delivery of his written or oral report,
participate in a hearing where the parties have the opportunity
to put questions to him and to present expert witnesses in order
to testify on the points at issue.
Article 27. Court assistance in taking evidence
The arbitral tribunal or a party with the approval of the
arbitral tribunal may request from a competent court of this
State assistance in taking evidence. The court may execute the
request within its competence and according to its rules on
taking evidence.
CHAPTER VI. MAKING OF AWARD AND
TERMINATION OF
PROCEEDINGS
Article 28. Rules applicable to substance of dispute
(1) The arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute in accordance
with such rules of law as are chosen by the parties as applicable
to the substance of the dispute. Any designation of the law or
legal system of a given State shall be construed, unless
otherwise expressed, as directly referring to the substantive law
of that State and not to its conflict of laws rules.
(2) Failing any designation by the parties, the arbitral
tribunal shall apply the law determined by the conflict of laws
rules which it considers applicable.
(3) The arbitral tribunal shall decide ex aequo et bono
or as amiable compositeur only if the parties have
expressly authorized it to do so.
(4) In all cases, the arbitral tribunal shall decide in
accordance with the terms of the contract and shall take into
account the usages of the trade applicable to the transaction.
Article 29. Decision making by panel of arbitrators
In arbitral proceedings with more than one arbitrator, any
decision of the arbitral tribunal shall be made, unless otherwise
agreed by the parties, by a majority of all its members.
However, questions of procedure may be decided by a presiding
arbitrator, if so authorized by the parties or all members of the
arbitral tribunal.
Article 30. Settlement
(1) If, during arbitral proceedings, the parties settle the
dispute, the arbitral tribunal shall terminate the proceedings
and, if requested by the parties and not objected to by the
arbitral tribunal, record the settlement in the form of an
arbitral award on agreed terms.
(2) An award on agreed terms shall be made in accordance with
the provisions of article 31 and shall state that it is an award.
Such an award has the same status and effect as any other award
on the merits of the case.
Article 31. Form and contents of award
(1) The award shall be made in writing and shall be signed by
the arbitrator or arbitrators. In arbitral proceedings with more
than one arbitrator, the signatures of the majority of all
members of the arbitral tribunal shall suffice, provided that the
reason for any omitted signature is stated.
(2) The award shall state the reasons upon which it is based,
unless the parties have agreed that no reasons are to be given or
the award is an award on agreed terms under article 30.
(3) The award shall state its date and the place of arbitration
as determined in accordance with article 20(1). The award shall
be deemed to have been made at that place.
(4) After the award is made, a copy signed by the arbitrators in
accordance with paragraph (1) of this article shall be delivered
to each party.
Article 32. Termination of proceedings
(1) The arbitral proceedings are terminated by the final award
or by an order of the arbitral tribunal in accordance with
paragraph (2) of this article.
(2) The arbitral tribunal shall issue an order for the
termination of the arbitral proceedings when:
(a) the claimant withdraws his claim, unless the respondent
objects thereto and the arbitral tribunal recognizes a legitimate
interest on his part in obtaining a final settlement of the
dispute;
(b) the parties agree on the termination of the proceedings;
(c) the arbitral tribunal finds that the continuation of the
proceedings has for any other reason become unnecessary or
impossible.
(3) The mandate of the arbitral tribunal terminates with the
termination of the arbitral proceedings, subject to the
provisions of articles 33 and 34(4).
Article 33. Correction and interpretation of award;
additional award
(1) Within thirty days of receipt of the award, unless another
period of time has been agreed upon by the parties:
(a) a party, with notice to the other party, may request the
arbitral tribunal to correct in the award any errors in
computation, any clerical or typographical errors or any errors
of similar nature;
(b) if so agreed by the parties, a party, with notice to the
other party, may request the arbitral tribunal to give an
interpretation of a specific point or part of the award.
If the arbitral tribunal considers the request to be justified,
it shall make the correction or give the interpretation within
thirty days of receipt of the request. The interpretation shall
form part of the award.
(2) The arbitral tribunal may correct any error of the type
referred to in paragraph (1)(a) of this article on its own
initiative within thirty days of the date of the award.
(3) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, a party, with notice
to the other party, may request, within thirty days of receipt of
the award, the arbitral tribunal to make an additional award as
to claims presented in the arbitral proceedings but omitted from
the award. If the arbitral tribunal considers the request to be
justified, it shall make the additional award within sixty days.
(4) The arbitral tribunal may extend, if necessary, the period
of time within which it shall make a correction, interpretation
or an additional award under paragraph (1) or (3) of this
article.
(5) The provisions of article 31 shall apply to a correction or
interpretation of the award or to an additional award.
CHAPTER VII. RECOURSE AGAINST AWARD
Article 34. Application for setting aside as exclusive
recourse against
arbitral award
(1) Recourse to a court against an arbitral award may be made
only by an application for setting aside in accordance with
paragraphs (2) and (3) of this article.
(2) An arbitral award may be set aside by the court specified in
article 6 only if:
(a) the party making the application furnishes proof that:
(i) a party to the arbitration agreement referred to in article
7 was under some incapacity; or the said agreement is not valid
under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing
any indication thereon, under the law of this State; or
(ii) the party making the application was not given proper
notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral
proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case; or
(iii) the award deals with a dispute not contemplated by or not
falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or
contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission
to arbitration, provided that, if the decisions on matters
submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so
submitted, only that part of the award which contains decisions
on matters not submitted to arbitration may be set aside; or
(iv) the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral
procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the
parties, unless such agreement was in conflict with a provision
of this Law from which the parties cannot derogate, or, failing
such agreement, was not in accordance with this Law; or
(b) the court finds that:
(i) the subject-matter of the dispute is not capable of
settlement by arbitration under the law of this State; or
(ii) the award is in conflict with the public policy of this
State.
(3) An application for setting aside may not be made after three
months have elapsed from the date on which the party making that
application had received the award or, if a request had been made
under article 33, from the date on which that request had been
disposed of by the arbitral tribunal.
(4) The court, when asked to set aside an award, may, where
appropriate and so requested by a party, suspend the setting
aside proceedings for a period of time determined by it in order
to give the arbitral tribunal an opportunity to resume the
arbitral proceedings or to take such other action as in the
arbitral tribunal's opinion will eliminate the grounds for
setting aside.
CHAPTER VIII. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT
OF AWARDS
Article 35. Recognition and enforcement
(1) An arbitral award, irrespective of the country in which it
was made, shall be recognized as binding and, upon application in
writing to the competent court, shall be enforced subject to the
provisions of this article and of article 36.
(2) The party relying on an award or applying for its
enforcement shall supply the duly authenticated original award or
a duly certified copy thereof, and the original arbitration
agreement referred to in article 7 or a duly certified copy
thereof. If the award or agreement is not made in an official
language of this State, the party shall supply a duly certified
translation thereof into such language.***
Article 36. Grounds for refusing recognition or
enforcement
(1) Recognition or enforcement of an arbitral award,
irrespective of the country in which it was made, may be refused
only:
(a) at the request of the party against whom it is invoked, if
that party furnishes to the competent court where recognition or
enforcement is sought proof that:
(i) a party to the arbitration agreement referred to in article
7 was under some incapacity; or the said agreement is not valid
under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing
any indication thereon, under the law of the country where the
award was made; or
(ii) the party against whom the award is invoked was not given
proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the
arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case;
or
(iii) the award deals with a dispute not contemplated by or not
falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or it
contains
*** The conditions set forth in this paragraph are intended to
set maximum standards. It would, thus, not be contrary to the
harmonization to be achieved by the model law if a State retained
even less onerous conditions.
decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to
arbitration, provided that, if the decisions on matters submitted
to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, that
part of the award which contains decisions on matters submitted
to arbitration may be recognized and enforced; or
(iv) the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral
procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties
or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance with the law of
the country where the arbitration took place; or
(v) the award has not yet become binding on the parties or has
been set aside or suspended by a court of the country in which,
or under the law of which, that award was made; or
(b) if the court finds that:
(i) the subject-matter of the dispute is not capable of
settlement by arbitration under the law of this State; or
(ii) the recognition or enforcement of the award would be
contrary to the public policy of this State.
(2) If an application for setting aside or suspension of an
award has been made to a court referred to in paragraph (1)(a)(v)
of this article, the court where recognition or enforcement is
sought may, if it considers it proper, adjourn its decision and
may also, on the application of the party claiming recognition or
enforcement of the award, order the other party to provide
appropriate security.