Conceptual Critique

To enhance your use of the Blackboard Discussion Board, I ask each of you to prepare and post an analytical treatment of one of the thinkers that we will cover this semester.  To do this, you will need to do three things:

1.  Select a thinker you want to analyze.  The list of available thinkers is noted below.  Send me an email noting the top three thinkers you'd like to examine.  I will allocate thinkers on a first-come, first-served basis.  The sooner you get me your list of choices, the greater the likelihood you will get the thinker you want to critique, but your choices must sent to me no later than Thursday, 29 January.  After that date, I will simply assign remaining thinkers to the slackers who don't follow these instructions.

2.  Prepare your analysis in accordance with the "Concepts - The Building Blocks of Analysis" handoutDiscuss how your thinker frames his/her analysis by noting how s/he "conceptualizes" --  conceives or defines -- each of the variables listed on the handout.

3.  Post three questions or statements about your thinker that you think will help others come to grips with his/her analysis.  These questions should be at the end of your conceptual critique of your thinker.

Guidelines

1.  Send me an email noting the top three thinkers you'd like to examine.  I will allocate thinkers on a first-come, first-served basis.  The sooner you get me your list of choices, the greater the likelihood you will get the thinker you want to critique, but your choices must sent to me no later than Thursday, 29 January.  After that date, I will simply assign remaining thinkers to the slackers who don't follow these instructions.

2.  Your analysis and questions must be posted two calendar days before we begin our treatment of the thinker.   Failure to do so will result in application of the late penalty noted in the syllabus.

3.  Your analysis should be posted as a new thread, with the thinker you are critiquing in the subject heading of the discussion thread.

4.  Your critical conceptual analysis should be well-developed (2-4 pp), and contain specific citations to relevant quotations and page citations.  Just fill in and flesh out the cells in the "Concepts - The Building Blocks of Analysis" handout and post that on Blackboard as directed above.

5.  I expect all students to comment on these postings, to elaborate and critique them, on the discussion board.  Half of your participation grade will be based on your Discussion page postings.

6.  While you will not formally present your thinker to the class, I will call on you frequently as the first person to comment on his/her thought when we discuss it in class.

Thinker

Student

John Winthrop

 

John Wise

 

Thomas Paine

 

J. Crevecoeur (letters I-II)
J. Crevecoeur (letters III-IV)
J. Crevecoeur (letters IX, XII)

a. 
b.
c.

John Adams

Matt Tullman

James Madison (Papers 10, 37, 39, 44)
James Madison (Papers 44, 47, 48, 51)
James Madison (Papers 51, 55, 62, 63)

a.  Fulton Taylor
b.  Charlie Hale
c.  Lauren Chase

Alexander Hamilton (Papers 1, 9, 15, 70)
Alexander Hamilton (Papers 70, 78, 84, 85)

a.   Jarrod Ray
b.  Ruthie Keister

The Anti-Federalists

David R. Fleury

Thomas Jefferson

Tori Green

Henry David Thoreau

Rhiannon Hamam

Elizabeth Cady Stanton

Elise M. Houren

Frederick Douglass

Alex Perez

Oretes Brownson

James Weisenburger*

George Fitzhugh

Caleb Browning

John C. Calhoun

Meredith Levine

Abraham Lincoln

Rob Hayden

William Graham Sumner

Fernando Rico

Edward Bellamy

Ross Hill*

Booker T. Washington

Alex Meaker

W.E.B. DuBois

Lindsay Johnston

Emma Goldman

Clare Lundy

Eugene V. Debs

Greg Mandel

Theodore Roosevelt

Veronica Davis

Herbert Croly

Corey Steadman*

Franklin D. Roosevelt

Benjamin Painter

Martin Luther King

Becks Lovelace

Students for a Democratic Society

Amy Lee

National Conference of Catholic Bishops

Micaela Watkins*

Russell Krik

Max Camp

Ronald Reagan

Paul Montemayor

*denotes student who expressed no preference as to thinker.

(back to class homepage)