To return to the Kemper Faculty Home Page, click here.

CF 3333 Home Page,click here

To go to the CF 3333 Schedule,click here
CF 3333 Clash of Cultures

CF 3333     FALL 2007

CLASH OF CULTURES:

 1450-1850

Syllabus

 

CF 3333 will meet for lectures on Tuesday evenings in 123 Fondren Science. In addition to attending lectures, all students will participate in an assigned discussion section, which will convene at the times appointed in the accompanying “Schedule of Meetings and Assignments.”

 

CF3333 701       123  Fondren Science Bldg             Carter 

CF3333 702       158  Fondren Science Bldg             Kemper 

CF3333 703       152  Dallas Hall                              Phinney

CF3333 704       157  Dallas Hall                              Adkins  

ABOUT THIS SYLLABUS

CF (Cultural Formations) courses are probably a bit different from other courses you have taken in college. The point of view for courses in the CF series is interdisciplinary, drawing on the insights of several fields of study. The chances are that you have never taken a course quite like this before. In any case, it normally takes students several weeks to become accustomed to the distinctive outlook of a CF course. We urge you to be patient. You will be able to master this approach. Over the years the staff of CF 3333 (previously listed as CORE 1333) has designed and redesigned this syllabus to make the point of view taken by this course more clear to you. That is why our syllabus contains much more than a listing of required books, written assignments, readings, and due dates. 

We shall approach the problem of “cultural formations” from a particular perspective; namely, the perspective of “institutions.” What are institutions [note the use of the plural!]? Every human population, from a band of hunter-gatherers to a large-scale industrial society, faces certain problems. It has to maintain itself in its environment, supplying the immediate needs of the individuals of which it is composed. It has to perpetuate itself through successive generations of individuals, and it has to give its members the sense that the benefits of belonging to their society outweigh the costs; otherwise, it disintegrates. It has to provide directions for common under-takings (leadership), to enforce norms of socially approved behavior (reinforcement), and to find means of settling disputes within the group (mediation). It has to answer people's questions about the place of humankind in the world at large and the worth of their own existence.

The simplest way to think of institutions is to regard them as subsystems of the society oriented toward the solution of one or more of these problems. The subsystem may be so large as to include nearly the whole population of a given society, or it may be relatively small (think of food supply as a problem, agriculture as a solution; then contrast the proportion of agricultural workers to total population in a peasant society with the corresponding proportion for agriculture in the United States). The members of the subsystem may have highly specialized functions (contrast a group of fishermen all mending their nets with the workers in a Ford factory). The members of the subsystem may all enjoy roughly the same status, or they may be sharply differentiated as to the status they enjoy (contrast a New England town meeting with Queen Elizabeth's opening of Parliament).
Thanks to their problem-solving orientation, institutions are not just subsystems or groups of people considered from any point of view. They are subsystems or groups whose members have more or less similar roles to play, and these roles are governed by rules. The study of roles and rules is a major part of the study of institutions, so that institutions thus form a bridge between society and culture. At times an ambiguity creeps into our speaking and writing about institutions. It is not always clear when we refer to “the king,” for example, whether we are referring to the king as a person or as a role in a certain kind of state (a monarchy).

To some extent this ambiguity reflects our own experience of identification with the roles we play in various institutions: we are unique, named individuals, but we also have an identity by our membership in particular institutions: as Republicans or Libertarians, Baptists or Episcopalians, Teamsters or Bank Presidents. Abstracting slightly from these identifications, we find ourselves considering such institutions as political parties, churches, labor unions, and the nobility.

 

To organize our abstractions, we can classify institutions according to the particular kinds of problem they solve, and speak of those concerned with the production and distribution of goods as the economic institutions of a given society, those concerned with the transmission of knowledge to new generations as its educational institutions, those concerned with leadership, mediation, and reinforcement as its political institutions, and those concerned with meaning and value as its religious institutions.

 

But these neat pigeonholes work only as abstractions, as instruments of thought. In practice, institutions usually show a blend of functions. A college of priests may pass on secret religious teaching to a few disciples: does this make them an educational institution as well as a religious one? A bank president may bring home a few trout from a weekend's fishing: does this shift him from finance to food-gathering? And finally, we might ask whether such classification by function tells the whole story about institutions. The problems remain constant throughout the spectrum of human societies, but the particular institutional arrangements found in different societies vary widely. Particular institutions (e.g., a hunting party, a group of farmers maintaining an irrigation system, a royal court, a university, a temple, an army, a factory, a prison) can only be understood if we look both at their role(s) in their own society and at how they compare with institutions of similar types found in other societies.

 

No human population exists in a vacuum. It has an environment that favors some kinds of activity and discourages others. It makes contact with other human groups. It faces short-term and long-term change. If it is to thrive, or even to survive, it must adapt to these changes, just as an individual organism must. Institutions adaptive at one stage of a society's career may be neutral or even maladaptive at another. The persistence of institutions which have ceased to be adaptive is one sign that a purely functional approach to institutions does not tell the whole story about them. Human behavior is a complex phenomenon, one complicated by the ability of human beings to reflect on their own behavior. And institutions consist of human beings and share in their complexity!

 

ABOUT CF 3333

 

We eat Chinese food, we worry about the conflicts in the ethnic states emerging in the Middle East, from the former Soviet Union, and elsewhere around the globe; and we debate the merits of the extension of the North American Free Trade Agreement to other Latin American nations. It was not always so. In 1450 the civilizations of Europe, Arabia, India, and China coexisted with little knowledge of each other. In 1450 Muslims and Christians still fought in Spain. At the same time, the peoples of the “Americas” lived in splendid isolation from the rest of the world. By 1850, all this had changed. The outward expansion of European societies ended the old pattern of regionalism. This breakdown of the global equilibrium and its consequence – what we call the “clash of cultures” – are examined in CF 3333.

 

That Europeans were "successful" in this global clash of cultures still surprises many historians and social scientists. We shall look at how rearrangements of European institutions, first between church and state and later between the public and private sectors, were critical to the transformation of the global system. We shall also examine the clash of cultures from the perspective of the non-European peoples who found their traditions challenged, threatened, and often destroyed. We will give special attention to the impact of Europeans on the peoples of North America. Prof. Phinney will offer three extended lectures examining the history of those transformations.

 

Thus, CF 3333 focuses on key "transformations" in our recent past: religious transformations (the Reformation); cultural transformations (the confrontation of Europeans and the native peoples of the Americans); political transformations (the English "Glorious Revolution," the American Revolution, the French Revolution); social transformations (efforts at equality in gender relations in England and France); economic transformations (industrial capitalism spreading from Britain across the globe); and ideological transformations (socialism and communism as challenges to European "democratic" capitalism).

 

In the period 1450-1850, the world grew richer, more complex, and closer together. The global village of the late 20th century was created by the clash of cultures during the age of European expansionism. Today and in the future we live with the consequences of this conflict.

 

COURSE EXPECTATIONS

 

1. It is expected that you will attend, and be on time for, all lectures and discussions. For an absence to be considered “excused,” appropriate documentation must be provided to your section leader. You will be expected to bring the materials appropriate for the lectures and the materials assigned for the week to the discussion section.

 

2. CF 3333 requires the following written work: three take home essays (the first and second each worth 15%, the third worth 20% each), quizzes (totaling 10%), an objective midterm (counting 15%) and a final (objective and short essay worth 20%). The remaining 5% will be based on attendance at lecture and participation in section; please see #4 below. The final exam (11 December) will include an objective section (similar to the midterm) and an essay. Please note that both the midterm and final will include a map quiz. New Option (as of 11-13-2007): students may (a) follow the requirements laid out in this paragraph or (b) may elect not to write the third essay.  If the second option is selected, then the final exam will count as 40% of the course grade.

 

Please also note that the weighting assigned to each component is not intended to reduce the teacher's discretion. A brilliant job on the later assignments may serve to minimize the effects of earlier unsatisfactory work. As you can tell, we are concerned about your attendance. An attendance roster may be distributed at class meetings.

 

3. For best results on essays and exams, please arrange to contact your section leader for any extra assistance that may be required. Late essays will be penalized heavily (i.e., one full letter grade per day, not counting Saturdays and Sundays) and missed quizzes cannot be retaken.

 

4. Section grades will be based on quizzes and class discussion. Section discussion should be worthwhile; that is, we expect you to have read what you are talking about. Each week, you must prepare a written question about the readings/videos/lecture materials. The questions submitted will constitute an important part of your section grade.

 

5. The Final Examination (and the Map Quiz) will be given from 6:30 PM to 8:30 PM on 11 December. No examination will be scheduled at an earlier time. You must plan to be present at this examination. To sit for an examination takes precedence over all other obligations. See the Final Exam Preparation Guide.

6. Disability Accommodations: Students needing academic accommodations for a disability must first contact Ms. Rebecca Marin, Coordinator, Services for Students with Disabilities (214-768-4557) to verify the disability and establish eligibility for accommodations.  They should then schedule an appointment with the professor to make appropriate arrangements. (See University Policy No. 2.4.)

7. Religious Observance: Religiously observant students wishing to be absent on holidays that require missing class should notify their professors in writing at the beginning of the semester, and should discuss with them, in advance, acceptable ways of making up any work missed because of the absence. (See University Policy No. 1.9.)

8. Excused Absences for University Extracurricular Activities: Students participating in an officially sanctioned, scheduled University extracurricular activity should be given the opportunity to make up class assignments or other graded assignments missed as a result of their participation. It is the responsibility of the student to make arrangements with the instructor prior to any missed scheduled examination or other missed assignment for making up the work. (University Undergraduate Catalogue)

 

TEXTS

 

Philip J. Adler, World Civilizations. Volume Two: Since 1500. Fourth Edition. Wadsworth.

George Bernard Shaw, Major Barbara [any one of several available editions will do].

Clash of Cultures: A Sourcebook.

 

IMPORTANT NOTE:

The first part (pp. i-xii and 1-68) of the Sourcebook will be given to students at the first class meeting on 28 August; a second installment will be distributed on 11 September, and the final part will be distributed at the Midterm on 9 October. For students who pay in full no later than 11 September, the cost will be discounted to $25 (including sales tax). Payments should be given to your discussion section instructor, in cash or by check (made out to SMU). After September 11th, the cost of the Sourcebook will be $30 (including sales tax). All payments are due no later than the midterm, 9 October. Note: IOUs, which will be returned to you as your receipt upon payment, will be distributed on the first evening to all students.

 

 

Valid HTML 4.01!    Approved AAA Bobby